Account audit
A written review of structure, tracking, wasted spend and quick wins, with severity and effort against each item. Yours to keep regardless of what you decide.
Most underperforming ad accounts are not badly bid — they are badly measured. Before touching a budget I find out whether your conversions are real, because a dashboard counting page views as leads will make a failing campaign look like a success for months. One accountable person on strategy, campaign build, creative, landing pages and tracking, with your ad accounts in your name.

Every figure here comes from accounts written up on my case studies page. Past results on other accounts are evidence of method, not a forecast for yours.
Three layers, worked in this order. Reversing them is the single most expensive habit in paid media.

This is where I start, and it is why accounts I take over often improve before a single bid changes. An account that counts the wrong things will reliably optimise toward the wrong outcome — and because the dashboard looks healthy, nobody questions it.
So the first job is making measurement honest: conversions defined as real form submissions and call clicks, duplicates removed, micro-conversions separated from genuine enquiries, and spend traced through to a lead your sales team would recognise.

The useful question is not “which platform is best” but “where is the demand, and is it already looking for me?” Search captures intent that exists. Social creates intent that does not. Spreading a small budget across four platforms to look thorough produces four sets of inconclusive data.
For a Mumbai service business that usually means Google Ads first for people already searching, then Meta for the much larger group who would buy but have not thought to look. For B2B, LinkedIn earns its higher cost per click when the targeting is genuinely account-based.

With automated bidding doing most of the arithmetic, the remaining levers are structure, audience, offer and creative — roughly in that order of neglect. So campaigns get built to isolate variables: one idea tested at a time, with enough budget behind it to produce a readable answer.
Negative keywords, placement exclusions and network settings get the same attention. They are tedious, they never appear in a case study headline, and they are frequently where most of a wasted budget is hiding.
Documented work you can audit — not a dashboard screenshot with the good month circled.
A written review of structure, tracking, wasted spend and quick wins, with severity and effort against each item. Yours to keep regardless of what you decide.
GA4 and GTM configured properly, conversions verified end to end, and a one-page map of what each event actually means.
Structure, targeting, copy and creative, all inside accounts you own and can take back at any time.
Spend, cost per lead, trend against previous months, and a walk-through in plain English rather than platform jargon.
Every change made, the date, and the reasoning. So a result can be traced to a decision instead of attributed to vibes.
The ad copy and creatives produced for you, with test results recorded so winners inform the next round instead of being re-guessed.
Access to your existing accounts, then a full review: structure, search terms, wasted spend, conversion definitions, landing page performance. Nothing changes until we both agree what the numbers currently mean — and whether they mean anything at all.
Conversion tracking rebuilt and verified by submitting real test enquiries end to end. Skipping this step is how accounts run for a year optimising toward page views.
Campaigns rebuilt or restructured, negatives applied, creative and copy produced, landing pages matched to ad promises. Launch deliberately small enough to learn from and large enough to read.
Weekly review of search terms, placements and creative performance. One variable isolated per test, with changes logged. Resisting the urge to change five things at once is most of the discipline.
Budget moved toward what produces qualified enquiries, not the cheapest clicks. Then the funnel underneath gets attention — because once cost per lead is stable, the next gain is in follow-up and conversion, not in the ad account.
Three real options plus the one to avoid. Including where a freelancer is the wrong answer.
| Cheap ‘ads package’ | Agency retainer | In-house hire | Working with me | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | Lowest | High, plus minimum spend | Salary plus tools and training | Fixed fee, no spend percentage |
| Who touches the account | Unclear | Often a junior on many accounts | One dedicated person | The person you spoke to |
| Incentive alignment | Volume of clients | Often % of spend — rewards spending more | Your targets | Fixed fee — no reason to inflate spend |
| Conversion tracking | Rarely verified | Usually handled | Depends on the hire | Rebuilt and verified before launch |
| Landing pages | Not included | Extra cost or another team | Needs a designer too | Designed and built by the same person |
| Account ownership | Frequently theirs | Usually yours, verify it | Yours | Yours, with you as admin |
| Breadth and capacity | None | Many channels, many people, cover for absence | Limited to one skill set | One person — so eight channels at once is not my fit |
| Best suited to | Nothing you rely on | Large budgets and broad channel needs | Mature teams with constant volume | SMEs and growing brands wanting a senior pair of hands |
If you need twenty-four-hour coverage, several specialists and a formal procurement process, an agency fits better — and I will say so rather than overcommit.
Fixed monthly fee quoted after an audit. Ad spend is always paid by you, directly to the platform.
You suspect something is wrong — find out what
The engagement most clients choose
One platform, run properly
No engagement includes guaranteed lead volume or a promised cost per lead. Those depend on your offer, pricing, competition and follow-up speed — and anyone guaranteeing them is quoting a number they cannot be held to.
The Educativo account, written up in full on my case studies page.

Educativo’s dashboard showed conversions climbing while the phone stayed quiet. Two things were true at once: GA4 was counting page views as conversions, so every visitor looked like a lead, and the Search Partners network was consuming roughly ninety-five percent of the budget while producing no enquiries at all. Rebuilding the tracking around real form submissions and call clicks, cutting Search Partners, narrowing to nine comparison-intent keywords and adding two hundred-plus negatives produced a forty percent lift in leads and a thirty percent lower cost per click within sixty days. None of that was clever bidding. It was refusing to optimise against numbers that were not true.
Sheikh completely turned around our Google Ads. We went from burning money on fake conversions to getting real, qualified enquiries every single day. The 40% lead increase was just the beginning.
Four questions, and what the answers tell you. Useful whether or not you ever hire me.
A percentage of ad spend creates a quiet conflict: the person advising you on budget earns more when the budget rises, whatever the return. A fixed fee removes that. Neither model is fraudulent and plenty of good people work on percentage — but you should know which incentive is operating before you take budget advice.
If the answer is vague, stop. In the accounts I audit, the most common faults are page views counted as conversions, the same action imported twice so totals are inflated, and no separation between a brochure download and a real enquiry. A conversion should be something your sales team would recognise as a lead. Ask to see the event definition, then submit a test enquiry and watch it appear.
Your campaigns should live in your own Google Ads and Meta accounts, with your billing and you as primary admin. The reason is practical rather than legal: conversion history makes future campaigns cheaper, and that history is often worth more than the campaigns themselves. If your advertising runs inside somebody else’s account, leaving means starting from zero.
Good answers involve waiting. You need roughly thirty conversions on a variant before a difference means anything — below that you are reading noise and calling it insight. Anyone reporting a decisive result from four days and nine conversions is either inexperienced or counting on you not to ask.
Paid search tells you within a fortnight which queries actually convert. That is a far faster signal than waiting months for organic rankings, so it should direct where SEO effort goes instead of guessing. Running the other way, organic rankings gradually lower your blended acquisition cost, which frees paid budget for testing new markets. Treating them as rival line items is the expensive way to run both.
Campaigns do not fix a weak offer, an unclear price or a sales team that takes two days to call back. They make all three visible faster and more expensively. In the Young AI Champs work, the step that moved enrolments was not a bidding change — it was WhatsApp follow-up reaching the lead within thirty seconds of the form. If your response time is measured in days, fix that before increasing spend. It is cheaper and it works faster.
The things worth settling before any money goes into a platform.
I work on a fixed monthly management fee, quoted after looking at your account and goals, with ad spend paid directly by you to Google or Meta. A fixed fee keeps the incentives honest: a percentage-of-spend model quietly rewards whoever is managing your account for spending more, which is the opposite of what you are hiring them to optimise. Ask any freelancer or agency how they are paid before anything else.
You do. Campaigns run inside your own Google Ads and Meta Business accounts, with your billing and you as primary admin, and I am granted access as a user. This means your campaign history, conversion data and audience lists stay with you if we stop working together. Never let anyone run your advertising inside an account you do not control — you lose the historical data that makes future campaigns cheaper, and that data is often worth more than the campaigns themselves.
Enough to produce roughly 30 or more conversions a month on the channel you pick, because below that you cannot tell a real change from random noise and no amount of optimisation skill substitutes for data. In practice that means working backwards from your cost per lead rather than from a round number. If your budget cannot reach that threshold on two channels, run one channel properly instead of splitting it and learning nothing on either.
Traffic arrives within days of launch. Reliable decisions take longer: expect two to three weeks of learning before the data supports meaningful optimisation, and six to eight weeks before cost per lead settles into a trend you can plan around. Anyone promising a stable cost per acquisition in the first fortnight is describing luck, not a method.
No. Lead volume and cost depend on your offer, pricing, competition, seasonality and how fast your team follows up — most of which sit outside an advertising account. What I commit to is a documented account structure, correctly configured conversion tracking, a written optimisation log and monthly reporting you can audit. If a freelancer or agency guarantees a cost per lead, ask what happens when they miss it; the answer is usually nothing.
Start with Google Ads if people already search for what you sell, because you are capturing demand that exists and intent is explicit. Start with Meta Ads if your product needs to be explained or shown, or if your audience is defined by interests and demographics rather than by a search query. For most service businesses in Mumbai, Google captures the demand and Meta creates it — but running both badly on a small budget is worse than running one well.
I write ad copy, design static creatives and build the landing pages, so a campaign does not stall waiting on someone else. Video production and photography are outside what I offer — for those I will tell you plainly that you need a specialist rather than deliver something mediocre. Being able to design the landing page and the campaign together is the practical advantage of hiring one person for both.
Spend, impressions, clicks, cost per click, conversions, cost per lead and the trend against previous months — plus a written log of every change made and why, and a plan for the next month. Reporting is built on GA4 and Google Tag Manager, with conversions defined as real form submissions and call clicks rather than page views. A report that shows impressions and reach without cost per enquiry is a report designed to look good.
It very often is, and it is the first thing I check. The most common faults are page views counted as conversions, which makes a failing campaign look successful; the same conversion imported twice so numbers are inflated; and no distinction between an enquiry and a brochure download. On the Educativo account documented in my case studies, page_view events were being counted as conversions while the Search Partners network consumed roughly 95% of budget without producing enquiries. Nothing can be optimised until measurement is honest.
There is a written scope covering what is managed, the fee, the reporting cadence and notice period. I ask for a realistic initial period — usually three months — because a shorter engagement bills you for a learning phase without the optimisation that follows it. Beyond that it is month to month. Because the accounts and data are already yours, leaving means revoking my access, not rebuilding from scratch.
Ready to scale your growth? Drop me a message or reach out directly.